Tuesday, 3 December 2024

Crying over spilt beer

Hard on the heels of the announcement of the closure of their Wolverhampton brewery, Carlsberg-Marston’s have informed us of their plans to discontinue a large number of mostly cask ales. These including, most strikingly, Banks’s Mild, the cornerstone on which the original Wolverhampton & Dudley company was built, and Bombardier, which maybe fifteen years ago seemed to crop up all over the place in the way that Doom Bar does now, and was even advertised on TV by the late Rik Mayall.

The full list of discontinued beers is:

Cask:
Banks’s Mild
Banks’s Sunbeam
Bombardier
Eagle IPA
Jennings Cumberland Ale
Marston’s Old Empire
Marston’s 61 Deep
Ringwood Boondoggle
Ringwood Old Thumper

Keg:
Mansfield Dark Smooth
Mansfield Original Bitter

However, some of these, including Banks’s Mild, will live on in keg or packaged form, so all is not entirely lost.

The combined company had inherited a sprawling portfolio of often overlapping brands, so some degree of rationalisation was inevitable. In particular, they had Cumberland Ale, Boondoggle, Sunbeam, Hobgoblin Gold and Wainwright Gold which all occupied much the same territory in the beer market. I’m not sure exactly where, but I’m sure I once went in a pub where the entire cask range comprised three beers from that list.

It is understandable that people will feel sadness and disappointment at this news, but a reaction of anger and betrayal seems misplaced. Whether it is pubs, beer brands or breweries, large companies have little room for sentimentality or considerations of “heritage”. People may feel an attachment to pubs or beers that they do not towards brands of chocolate or soap powder, but at the end of the day they are commercial products, not government services.

This applies further down the scale of size too – my local family brewer Robinson’s a few years ago dropped its Hatters Mild, to considerable outcry, and have also ruthlessly culled about a third of their pub estate, including some properties that at one time would have been regarded as jewels in their crown.

No doubt some twerp will pop up in the comments to say “You call yourself the Pub Curmudgeon, but you’re acting as an apologist for the international brewers.” However, all I’m doing is putting across the perhaps unpalatable truth. It has always been thus. If you sell your offspring to the crocodile, you should not be surprised if he ends up devouring some of them. And it’s hard to avoid the conclusion that, at least subsconsciously, some people seem to feel that the British pub and brewing industry should have been frozen in about 1955, and all discontinuation of brands, takeovers and pub and brewery closures should have to go through some form of statutory process.

It also seems ironic that some of the same people who, only a few weeks ago were urging us to drink independent beers whenever possible, are now lamenting the loss of big brewery products which presumably they considered to be inferior. If you won’t stand up for Eagle IPA, don’t be too surprised when its owners stop brewing it. On the other hand, some commentators have said that we should look to the future and concentrate on the wide variety of often excellent cask ales that are still available, rather than getting too upset about the loss of beers than many people didn’t think much of anyway. Boak & Bailey definitely fall into this camp.

It’s important to remember that Carlsberg-Marston’s is now a pure brewing operation under different ownership from the Marston’s pub company. What they produce is entirely dependent on what their customers want to order and, while to some extent they can promote particular products, they can’t dictate whether they appear on bars. If they’re selling less Banks’s Mild, it’s because customers aren’t drinking it and thus pubs aren’t ordering it.

On the other hand, a vertically integrated brewer and pub operator can decide which beers are sold in its pubs, which can provide a cushion against the fickle tides of fashion, while at the same time what appears on their bars is a reflection of the company as a whole. This virtuous circle is broken when the relationship is severed.

To some extent this is a hangover from the 1989 Beer Orders which did much to break the connection between brewer and pub operator, and have continued ever since to exercise a negative influence over the industry.

28 comments:

  1. Hard to disagree with you Curmudgeon. I am particularly saddened by the loss of Banks's Mild and Ringwood Old Thumper which i drink whenever I see them. I live in the Banks's heartland 25 miles from Wolverhampton and it is very diffcult to find the Mild now.

    ReplyDelete
  2. No great loss, none of it. All macro rubbish.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. In your opinion. I have had many great pints of Banks's and Ringwood. Certainly far better beer than the grapefruit beer espoused by CAMRA.

      Delete
    2. hear hear

      Delete
    3. Bet you don't complain about Bass, brewed by a macro brewer. But of course this is a typical beer anorak thing. You only want the ticks, and dismiss even really good beer because of some sort of weird ideology.

      Delete
  3. Sheffield Hatter3 December 2024 at 15:22

    I have seen it stated elsewhere that it is the keg version of Bombardier that is being dropped. CAMRA's press release of 24 November, also quoted by Pete Brown the next day, states that eight cask beers are for the chop, rather than the nine you list.

    ReplyDelete
  4. In the 1920s, Robert Link, a scoutmaster for the Boy Scouts of America, apparently coined the word to name the braided leather cords made and worn by scouts. The word came to prominence when such a boondoggle was presented to the Prince of Wales at the 1929 World Jamboree, and it's been with us ever since.

    A great beer and I enjoyed a few pints of it only last year. A truly wonderful drop. I will miss them all

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That's funny
      I thought it's called a woggle.

      Delete
  5. Jennings has effectively been wiped out despite being the most popular brewer in Cumbria before the takeover. Why is a foreign conglomerate allowed to buy up historic breweries and brands they have no intention of operating? Is that fair on the consumer?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It is part of the free enterprise system that created those historic brands, as you call it, to begin with. I could see your point if brewing, or at a certain scale, was a publicly owned industry but it's not. And if it was, I think that would be worse for consumers, all with all.

      Delete
    2. What is “free enterprise” about buying a brewery and immediately closing it down?

      Delete
    3. Perhaps 2-tier could intervene and bring brewing industry under state ownership, managed by the CAMRA collective, Mr Protz as a head honcho?

      Delete
    4. In the 1970s, Protz wrote a book called "Pulling a Fast One" in which he specifically advocated nationalisation of the brewing industry. Just imagine it now, all the beers reduced to 3.4% for the sake of Public Elf.

      Delete
    5. I said no such thing in that book

      Delete
    6. The workers should always own the means of production. There should be 3 beers called Bitter #1 , Mild #1 , Top Fermented #1 We need a revolution in beer

      Delete
    7. err, it is possible to oppose anti competitive practices from a foreign conglomerate without advocating for the nationalisation of the brewing industry.

      Delete
    8. Jennings wasn't taken over by a foreign conglomerate. Marston's PLC bought them in 2005. Marston's itself was taken over by Wolverhampton and Dudley Breweries prior to that, and the combined group renamed to Marston's PLC.

      Delete
  6. None of those beers are very good in bottles and/or cans. I've occasionally been given boxed assortments of them for Christmas and they all tastelessed the same. Bombardier was good on draught.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Agreed. It's also, or what's saying the same thing, this idea that brewers have any obligations to the public to maintain this or that brand portfolio, which I can't wrap my head around. Management answers finally to the owners, whose money is at risk.

    The correlative is, it opens opportunities to smaller brewers to make something similar.

    If the industry was publicly owned, akin to trust, it would be different, perhaps. It's (very much) not, the investors have their own money at risk, and management is alert to make the best decisions likely to increase their return or at least keep it at a satisfactory level. They may be wrong and may be right - I daresay the latter since they have information the public does not, but it's their call and bootless to critique a company in such circumstances, imo.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I remember when I was writing about the State Management Scheme in Carlisle thinking how things would be if it was still in operation today. There would be endless battles over closing pubs that were no longer seen as economically viable.

      "The Dog & Duck is a vital community hub!"

      "But only six people a week go in it!"

      There was something similar in the days of the Beeching Axe, when the ceremonial last train on a branch line would often carry more passengers than the line previously had in a typical month.

      Delete
    2. Indeed, it would become a bureaucratic exercise and deaden the whole idea of the public house. Reasonable regulation, yes, state ownership, much less of the breweries, no. Carlisle was an exceptional case due to being the centre of munitions manufacture, and then it lasted a long time due probably to administrative and bureaucratic stasis and gravity (so to speak). One of the British beer writers still enamoured of the book medium might consider examining the brewery side for a book project. I mean to canvass how sales, marketing and the brand portfolio especially, compared to the norm for the British brewing industry. Was there similar innovation, for example? (seems doubtful). Was there at any one time a range of brews made comparable to breweries in the private sector? Looking at sample labels at "Brewery History" for Old Brewery it seems fairly usual, even commendable in parts - that "malt wine" for example - but it's hard to tell from that list which might be telescoped over time. Or has anything like that been written? I know the pubs have been examined a lot but I think the breweries, not so much.

      Delete
    3. Sorry, this is the page of the Brewery History site I meant: http://breweryhistory.com/wiki/index.php?title=Carlisle_Old_Brewery_Co._Ltd

      On paper it looks not so bad, but apart likely telescoping, there is no lager, beer of the future. Keg beer, yes. But no lager. Telling unto itself. Nationalisation is never the answer.

      Delete
    4. I don’t think the fact that the Carlisle Brewery didn’t brew lager can be taken as an indication of the shortcomings of nationalisation: bear in mind that in 1973, when the brewery closed, only a minority of independent breweries produced lager, so it was in good company. Of the 88 independent breweries listed by Frank Baillie, for example, only a quarter brewed any kind of lager (whether bottled, keg or the top-fermented pale beer that sometimes passed for lager). Of those that did produce lager, only nine are still brewing. Irrespective of the merits or demerits of nationalisation, I think it was a pity that the brewery was not sold with at least some of the pubs. Unfortunately, my first visit to Carlisle was in summer 1973 – only a few months after the brewery closed – so I was never able to sample Carlisle beer.

      Delete
    5. @ John Lester, the Carlisle brewery didn't close until 1987. It had been taken over by Theakstons and then Matthew Brown, who brewed their own lagers in Workington. Several of the pubs were indeed included in the deal.

      Delete
    6. In response to Anonymous, the Carlisle brewery did in fact close in May 1973, bringing an end to the range of State beers. The brewery had been offered for sale as a separate lot from the four main groups of pubs; but, although the single tender received (from a businessman called Peter Lewis, who intended to continue to operate the brewery) was accepted, Lewis was unable to complete his purchase. In November 1973, another offer was accepted from a building firm (Holland and Threlfall (Norden) Ltd), which again intended to operate the brewery, but that offer also ran into difficulties. In March 1974, Theakston’s made an approach, and the brewery was sold to them in May 1974. Despite what Anonymous suggests, none of the pubs was included in this deal. Brewing was restarted in September 1974, but there was no attempt to reintroduce any of the former State beers, and, throughout the brewery’s subsequent history, the only cask-conditioned beer it produced was Theakston’s Best Bitter, which I sampled reasonably frequently in the late 70s and early 80s.

      Delete
    7. Thanks John, that was certainly my understanding, that the brewery was not sold as a going concern, and did not come with any of the former SMS pubs. IIRC most went to either Scottish & Newcastle or Greenall Whitley.

      Delete
  8. A sad day all those beloved beers going. I cried when I read the article. Were they any good? Anyone know if the Tesco will be doing some offers. Will be well up for that. Can see some real deep discounting.

    Never seen or heard of Sunbeam but I will sure miss it.

    In 20 years time some long lost relative of Johnny Marston will rejuvenate the brands. People will exclaim how wonderful they were. Whilst Jonty Farquar De Marstone will not even remember them as he is currently only halfway through Eton.

    ReplyDelete
  9. The cask beer market in Britain appears to be that the beardy enthusiasts get exited about a micro brewed beer. If it proves popular enough to hit a volume, The enthusiasts then declare it crap. It might at this point compound the error by selling up to a global giant looking for a brand that will sell at volume. It trots gently into a slow decline before being scrapped. All the enthusiasts complain about scaping a beer they wouldn't touch with a barge pole.

    ReplyDelete

Comments, especially on older posts, may require prior approval by the blog owner. See here for details of my comment policy.

Please register an account to comment. Unregistered comments will generally be rejected unless I recognise the author. If you want to comment using an unregistered ID, you will need to tell me something about yourself.