The full list of discontinued beers is:
Cask:
Banks’s Mild
Banks’s Sunbeam
Bombardier
Eagle IPA
Jennings Cumberland Ale
Marston’s Old Empire
Marston’s 61 Deep
Ringwood Boondoggle
Ringwood Old Thumper
Keg:
Mansfield Dark Smooth
Mansfield Original Bitter
However, some of these, including Banks’s Mild, will live on in keg or packaged form, so all is not entirely lost.
The combined company had inherited a sprawling portfolio of often overlapping brands, so some degree of rationalisation was inevitable. In particular, they had Cumberland Ale, Boondoggle, Sunbeam, Hobgoblin Gold and Wainwright Gold which all occupied much the same territory in the beer market. I’m not sure exactly where, but I’m sure I once went in a pub where the entire cask range comprised three beers from that list.
It is understandable that people will feel sadness and disappointment at this news, but a reaction of anger and betrayal seems misplaced. Whether it is pubs, beer brands or breweries, large companies have little room for sentimentality or considerations of “heritage”. People may feel an attachment to pubs or beers that they do not towards brands of chocolate or soap powder, but at the end of the day they are commercial products, not government services.
This applies further down the scale of size too – my local family brewer Robinson’s a few years ago dropped its Hatters Mild, to considerable outcry, and have also ruthlessly culled about a third of their pub estate, including some properties that at one time would have been regarded as jewels in their crown.
No doubt some twerp will pop up in the comments to say “You call yourself the Pub Curmudgeon, but you’re acting as an apologist for the international brewers.” However, all I’m doing is putting across the perhaps unpalatable truth. It has always been thus. If you sell your offspring to the crocodile, you should not be surprised if he ends up devouring some of them. And it’s hard to avoid the conclusion that, at least subsconsciously, some people seem to feel that the British pub and brewing industry should have been frozen in about 1955, and all discontinuation of brands, takeovers and pub and brewery closures should have to go through some form of statutory process.
It also seems ironic that some of the same people who, only a few weeks ago were urging us to drink independent beers whenever possible, are now lamenting the loss of big brewery products which presumably they considered to be inferior. If you won’t stand up for Eagle IPA, don’t be too surprised when its owners stop brewing it. On the other hand, some commentators have said that we should look to the future and concentrate on the wide variety of often excellent cask ales that are still available, rather than getting too upset about the loss of beers than many people didn’t think much of anyway. Boak & Bailey definitely fall into this camp.
It’s important to remember that Carlsberg-Marston’s is now a pure brewing operation under different ownership from the Marston’s pub company. What they produce is entirely dependent on what their customers want to order and, while to some extent they can promote particular products, they can’t dictate whether they appear on bars. If they’re selling less Banks’s Mild, it’s because customers aren’t drinking it and thus pubs aren’t ordering it.
On the other hand, a vertically integrated brewer and pub operator can decide which beers are sold in its pubs, which can provide a cushion against the fickle tides of fashion, while at the same time what appears on their bars is a reflection of the company as a whole. This virtuous circle is broken when the relationship is severed.
To some extent this is a hangover from the 1989 Beer Orders which did much to break the connection between brewer and pub operator, and have continued ever since to exercise a negative influence over the industry.
Hard to disagree with you Curmudgeon. I am particularly saddened by the loss of Banks's Mild and Ringwood Old Thumper which i drink whenever I see them. I live in the Banks's heartland 25 miles from Wolverhampton and it is very diffcult to find the Mild now.
ReplyDeleteNo great loss, none of it. All macro rubbish.
ReplyDeleteIn your opinion. I have had many great pints of Banks's and Ringwood. Certainly far better beer than the grapefruit beer espoused by CAMRA.
Deletehear hear
DeleteI have seen it stated elsewhere that it is the keg version of Bombardier that is being dropped. CAMRA's press release of 24 November, also quoted by Pete Brown the next day, states that eight cask beers are for the chop, rather than the nine you list.
ReplyDeleteIn the 1920s, Robert Link, a scoutmaster for the Boy Scouts of America, apparently coined the word to name the braided leather cords made and worn by scouts. The word came to prominence when such a boondoggle was presented to the Prince of Wales at the 1929 World Jamboree, and it's been with us ever since.
ReplyDeleteA great beer and I enjoyed a few pints of it only last year. A truly wonderful drop. I will miss them all
Jennings has effectively been wiped out despite being the most popular brewer in Cumbria before the takeover. Why is a foreign conglomerate allowed to buy up historic breweries and brands they have no intention of operating? Is that fair on the consumer?
ReplyDeleteIt is part of the free enterprise system that created those historic brands, as you call it, to begin with. I could see your point if brewing, or at a certain scale, was a publicly owned industry but it's not. And if it was, I think that would be worse for consumers, all with all.
DeleteWhat is “free enterprise” about buying a brewery and immediately closing it down?
DeleteNone of those beers are very good in bottles and/or cans. I've occasionally been given boxed assortments of them for Christmas and they all tastelessed the same. Bombardier was good on draught.
ReplyDeleteAgreed. It's also, or what's saying the same thing, this idea that brewers have any obligations to the public to maintain this or that brand portfolio, which I can't wrap my head around. Management answers finally to the owners, whose money is at risk.
ReplyDeleteThe correlative is, it opens opportunities to smaller brewers to make something similar.
If the industry was publicly owned, akin to trust, it would be different, perhaps. It's (very much) not, the investors have their own money at risk, and management is alert to make the best decisions likely to increase their return or at least keep it at a satisfactory level. They may be wrong and may be right - I daresay the latter since they have information the public does not, but it's their call and bootless to critique a company in such circumstances, imo.