Sunday, 3 January 2016

Passing on the torch

Recent months have been notable for a number of examples of major international brewers taking over some of the more successful craft breweries – Lagunitas and Ballast Point in the US, and Meantime and Camden in the UK. This has resulted in widespread disappointment amongst craft beer fans, feeling that they have been sold out or even betrayed.

Many would argue that the size of the company making it shouldn’t affect your opinion of a beer, but this attitude is understandable given that, at least in the US, the craft brewers originally sprang up to challenge the big boys and their sea of mediocre, bland beer. Selling out to “the man” is, for many, hard to forgive. On the other hand, if you are offered £85 million for a business that on a normal return-on-investment basis is worth £15 million, you will have to have some mighty principles to refuse.

It’s easy to see these takeovers in simplistic terms as buying out potentially threatening competition but, in reality, the reasoning is more complex, as Zak Avery explains here. It’s a recognition that “interesting” beer is the only section of the market that is growing, and the major brewers want a share of that. It also offers much higher margins. But they will have to be very careful not to devalue the brand equity by cost-cutting and dumbing down. Beer probably has more vocal and savvy buyers than any other consumer product.

There is a parallel in the way that, over the lifetime of CAMRA, many well-loved independent brewers have been taken over by their bigger brethren. Yates & Jackson, Simpkiss, Hardys & Hansons, it’s a long list. If you have a copy of the 1989 Good Beer Guide you will find a photo of my good self on a protest march about the closure of Oldham Brewery. But this was all about acquiring more tied pubs, not buying brands. Promises about maintaining the character of beers and keeping breweries open almost always turned out to be written in sand. And, with very few exceptions, the brewery owners agreed to be bought out rather than being subject to a hostile takeover bid. Family brewers tend to sell up when the owning family are no longer interested in the business.

But this raises an important point. It may not seem remotely relevant when you’re just starting up, but ultimately every business requires either an exit strategy, or a continuation strategy. Over the past couple of years, we’ve had a number of “meet the brewer” presentations at meetings of our local CAMRA branch. It’s hard to generalise – some are young people who still have a day job but hope to go full-time, some give the impression of doing it on daddy’s money, some have a fully worked-out, ambitious business plan, some are doing it as a retirement or redundancy project. The one thing they have in common is an enthusiasm for beer beyond simply wanting to make money.

There will come a time, though, when every individual small business owner wants to move on. Most micro-breweries eventually just shut up shop because the owner has become too old, or unwell, or has lost interest, or isn’t making a worthwhile profit. If you look at the micros from the first couple of decades of CAMRA, few are still in existence in any form. In many cases, the brewing kit will be sold to someone else wanting to start up a brewery, which will give them a welcome leg-up.

Sometimes, the brewery can be sold as a going concern to someone else. This has happened both to small one-man operations and sizeable, established concerns such as Butcombe and Exmoor Ales. Or you can pass it on to your children or relatives, which has been the modus operandi of the family brewers. I’m sure there have been examples of this amongst micros, but I can’t readily think of any examples.

Ultimately, there’s the possibility of turning it into a listed company that is owned by a broad spread of shareholders and run by professional managers. But I think the last British start-up brewery to do that was set up in the 19th century. Or you can sell your operation to a larger rival, which is what start-ups in all sectors have been doing since the dawn of business. If you’re approaching retirement, or if you get an irresistible offer, who can blame you?

And there’s always the question of when Messrs Watt and Dickie of BrewDog will eventually get the offer they can’t refuse, even though they have been quick to exclude sell-out beers like Lagunitas and Camden from their bars and nail their flag of independence to the mast. Or will BrewDog become a world-bestriding colossus of craft beer? Only time will tell.

8 comments:

  1. Of course if/when the Scottish Brewery does sell out Twitter will implode and the internet will be broken - the wailing and gnashing of teeth that accompanied the Camden buy out will be as nothing compared to what will happen then.

    Can't wait myself - it will be fun to watch.

    ReplyDelete
  2. "Or will BrewDog become a world-bestriding colossus of craft beer?"

    I think you'll find that they already are. Well in the mind of James Watt, anyway.

    ReplyDelete
  3. @John - but with BrewDog it will be completely different. It won't be a takeover, it will be a "Punk Partnership" which involves MegaBrewCorp only acquiring 99.3% of the equity.

    I have a certain amount of respect for what BrewDog have achieved, but they really are setting up one hell of a hostage to fortune.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I meant to mention this earlier - I think Chiltern Brewery may be the only micro where one generation has handed over to the next:

    http://www.chilternbrewery.co.uk/our-story

    ReplyDelete
  5. You were once young enough to go on a protest march? But it was about a brewery and not something actually important? Jesus wept.

    As for the beer quality of bought out brands. Most evidence of previous examples shows the urge to cut costs. Doom bar no longer being Cornish. Meantime London Lager being blended with "identical specification liquid" brewed in Holland. Going far back most of the brands geeks now deride were once of a higher spec. Ignoring the lowering of the Stella ABV, I gather it was once lagered for longer and did not contain maize. It may be logical to say the value of the acquired brand is in maintaining product quality, but the track record is one of devaluing the brand for volume growth and milking it.

    The easiest way to cheapen lager is reduce the lagering time. Any German discount supermarket has "authentic" lager for about 50c a can. The ingredients are commodities, 90 days in lagering tanks cost money.

    Trade isn't always about fundementals. Beer has always been an image, a lifestyle as a brand that the young buy into for as long as I've boozed. Craft is as much about an image and set of "values" even if those values are stupid. Even if the liquid does not change, AB-Inbev beer cannot be "craft" as per the values of those that drink it and pay top dollar for it. The punter what pays gets to determine what is and isn't craft.

    As for when/if brewdog sell out. I think the problem will be their own growth long before ownership. They are already too big, too successful to be about the "beer" and not about the "money" Google, Microsoft, Apple, Amazon, Starbucks were all cool buckaneers once. Then they became big and evil.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Regarding handing the business over to the next generation; at local brewer Larkin’s, owner and head brewer Bob Dockerty’s nephew Harry, has been learning the ropes, presumably to take over the eventual running of the business. I also understand that over at Goacher’s, Phil Goacher’s son has been doing much the same thing

    ReplyDelete
  7. Vernon Amor of Wye Valley brewery took over from his father Peter

    ReplyDelete
  8. Good to hear that some breweries are being passed on to the next generation. Innovation is all well and good, but there's a need for continuity too. One day, the current new brewery boom will fade, and brewers will have to fall back on established reputations.

    ReplyDelete

Comments, especially on older posts, may require prior approval by the blog owner. See here for details of my comment policy.

Please register an account to comment. Unregistered comments will generally be rejected unless I recognise the author. If you want to comment using an unregistered ID, you will need to tell me something about yourself.