Wednesday 3 April 2024

Falling short of success

At CAMRA’s annual National Conference being held in Dundee later this month, the following motion has been put forward by Swale branch:
This Conference agrees that oversized lined glasses should be mandatory for pubs and clubs to be entered into the Good Beer Guide. It therefore instructs the National Executive to ensure that licensees are aware of this change and shall be given until the 2026 edition to comply.
My immediate reaction is “Good luck with that!” A better way of reducing the number of entries to double figures is hard to imagine, although obviously it would make life a lot easier for the intrepid people trying to tick off every pub in the guide. It also greatly overestimates CAMRA’s influence on the licensed trade.

I wrote about this back in 2014, and nothing has changed since then. It’s something that just isn’t seen as a significant issue any more. If it was, pubs might seek to gain a competitive advantage by using lined glasses, but in practice vanishingly few do. If there was already a critical mass of pubs using them, then such a motion might stand some chance of success, but there isn’t. A full measures law was included in the Labour manifesto in 2001, and indeed Wetherspoon’s jumped the gun on it, but in the end it never happened, and its time has now surely passed. I ran a quick poll on Twitter that shows it isn’t at all commonplace.

It also seems to be the case that British drinkers have an attachment to the concept of a brimming pint glass. Back in the days when oversize glasses were commonplace, a lot of drinkers didn't actually like them because of the air space left at the top of the glass, and described them as “glass buckets”. Somehow it just doesn’t look right.

You also have to be very careful what you wish for. Serving a pint to the line, and excluding the head above the line, is by definition giving a certain amount of over-measure due to the amount of liquid contained in the head. Plus it is difficult to achieve with any degree of accuracy in a busy pub. So, if such a law was brought in, it is inevitable that the major pub operators would lobby to be allowed to use metered dispense, to ensure they don’t give over-measure.

Now I used to like metered dispense when it was commonplace, because it ensured you got a full pint and prevented your beer being spoilt by barstaff with an incompetent pulling technique. But I imagine losing out on thirds and tasters would not go down too well, and nor would the loss of the “theatre of the serve” associated both with dispensing Draught Guinness and pulling cask pints.

And it’s impossible to discuss this subject without recalling that, in the 1980s and 90s, there was a large-scale replacement of oversize glasses with brim measures that CAMRA didn’t raise a peep about, because it also happened to involve the replacement of metered dispense with handpumps.

There is another motion on the order paper from Edinburgh and South-East Scotland Branch instructing CAMRA to abandon any campaigning for full pints on the grounds that it has been “by any metric, a failure”. I can’t see that one being passed either, but maybe it is time for CAMRA to recognise that it is pissing in the wind on this issue and put it on the back burner.

CAMRA beer festivals are often now the only places drinkers ever encounter lined glasses, and the lack of demand can make festival glasses difficult to source. It’s a gesture that comes across as “everyone’s out of step but our Johnny”, and perhaps that instruction should be quietly dropped too.

21 comments:

  1. Very defeatist attitude, Mudgie old chap. Seems to me CAMRA is a fine institution with many successes it can be proud of. Not least in this instance providing a home for the more eccentric gentleman who in other spheres of influence might be dangerous with their ideas A harmless outlet of inconsequence.

    I would like to join this CAMRA and vote to pass both contradictory motions but I could never join a club that includes woman or people that read the Guardian. I shall stick to Boodles.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I agree that the use of oversize glasses is a non issue for almost everyone, except the over zealous and circus clowns. I'm not a Camra member, and this is the sort of pointless debate that will keep me from joining. Spoons vouchers are the only thing keeping some members signed up. There is still far too much infighting trying to define cask ale. The wider public doesn't care about the terminology, they just want a reliable drink in a decent pub, and unless Camra shift focus to campaigning for all drinkers, which seems unlikely , it will become more and more irrelevant.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I came out of Camra when it did not support smokers in the run up to the 2007 smoking ban.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I came out of Camra when I realised its head honcho was, and is, a raging Marxist.

      Delete
    2. Ah yes, i had forgotten about Protz !

      Delete
    3. The underlying philosophy of the organisation, Schumacher’s Small is Beautiful, tends to attract left wing people. Conservatives tend to be attracted by the idea of conserving. In this case a British tradition for a British style of beer. These people tend to leave, slightly disappointed that it really isn’t about that. Left wing people tend to stay having found a drinking club of like-minded people. They are happy to sincerely believe it’s more than that and they are sticking it to capitalism by avoiding the products of large companies.

      Unless you’ve bought a lifetime card, like Mudge, in which case you stay. There are gentlemans drinking clubs that tend to attract and retain more conservatively minded people of both the left and right, like the masons or gentle sports like bowling or darts or metal detecting, so it’s not like CAMRA is the only club for boozers.

      But overall, CAMRA is a nice club if you like that sort of thing. Certainly, less influential than they like to believe but overall an interesting hangover of a different time. We’ll miss it when it’s gone.

      Delete
  4. Professor Pie-Tin4 April 2024 at 03:13

    File this under who gives a toss.
    The trend towards glasses covered in arty crap, hieroglyphs and assorted branding and logos is what gets on my wick.
    The other day I was handed a pint of Pride in an Inch's cider glass that looked like a child's colouring book.
    Clear glass and simple logo like a small red triangle is all you need, thanks very much.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I wrote last month about how branded glasses, whether you like them or not, have become an important promotional tool for beer (and cider).

      But I agree that getting a beer in the wrong branded glass is far worse than getting one in a plain glass.

      Delete
  5. This is to the credit of CAMRA.

    Instead of curating the opinions of members against some criteria of what it is acceptable, members are free to stand up for what they want and put it to the wider membership. I much admire it. A refreshing difference to many so called democratic movements.
    It doesn't matter whether you agree with the motion or treat it with derision, I like that people have stood up for what they think. More power to them.


    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, the fact that members can set policy is creditable, even if it sometimes comes up with silly ideas. Not sure if they've ever had a vote on the new definition of real cider, though, which everyone seems to think is bonkers.

      Delete
    2. Maybe you could ask your loyal readership for suggestions and propose a motion yourself.
      I suggest "CAMRA should value quality and consistency over novelty and variety when selecting pubs for inclusion in the Good Beer Guide"
      Go on, Mudgie lad, we have wandered in the wilderness for 40 years. Lead us to the promised land. Be our Joshua and let decent reliable bitter be our Jericho.

      Delete
  6. Professor Pie-Tin4 April 2024 at 11:58

    Despite having working in that there London for nigh on 30 years it still amazes me what suddenly becomes fashionable when a decent PR team goes to work.
    Mrs PPT and I took the rattler up to town yesterday to meet an old chum over from America who for reasons I won't go into was insisting on gifting me a $1,000 watch.
    We lunched at Brasserie Zedel just off Piccadilly Circus and arriving early we popped into a pub opposite called The Devonshire.
    It's okay but dark and grimy with a well-worn carpet. Decent pint of Guinness. But the place was rammed even at 12.30pm.
    Then it clicked - this is the trendy Devonshire I've been reading about with a hot ticket restaurant upstairs where you can't get a table for love nor money. It's not been open long but is already a " Michelin Guide pub " whatever that means and is earning rave reviews in the likes of GQ.
    Yet apart from the restaurant which I didn't look at it's still very much a bog-standard boozer with nearly £7 pints and £8 cheese and ham toasties as bar snacks. Far from the promised warm Irish welcome the bar staff were taciturn and barely cracked a smile.
    Yet an utter PR triumph with trendy ( mainly ) young folk lining Denman Street outside flopping pints and fighting to get to the bar inside.
    I know half a dozen better boozers within a five minute walk.
    But hats off for the owners' winning ability to polish a turd.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. £7 pints wouldn't sell in my neck of the woods. £3.50 is the going rate for cask. They sell loads of it too !

      Delete
  7. Exactly the sort of motion, regardless of any likelihood of success, that ensures CAMRA will never be taken seriously by the drinks trade in general, other than as a means for a bit of publicity from the useful idiots now and then.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. CAMRA being a large group of consumers and voters tends to be flattered by the pub and brewing industry. Everybody likes flattery so they tend to accept it. They are reassured they matter and their opinions count. Thanked for their custom and votes. Chucked an occasional hospitality freebie. It suits all concerned. No body is harmed. The status quo is maintained.

      Delete
  8. A day in the life of a 'Spoons.

    https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/i-spent-16-hours-wetherspoons-32525275

    ReplyDelete
  9. Professor Pie-Tin8 April 2024 at 08:15

    Craft beer is on the brink says The Guardian which inevitably blames the Tories and Brexit for its impeding demise instead of an over-supply of identikit over-hopped murk and bad management.

    https://www.theguardian.com/business/2024/apr/08/uk-craft-beer-sector-financial-hurdles

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yeh mate, dead on its arse to tell the truth. My beer magazine is going down the toilet. Turns out no one wants to pay good money to read about murky IPAs no more. The time has passed. Daddy isn’t best pleased with what I’ve done with my inheritance to be honest. But at least CAMRA is still going. They are still willing to pay a dollar for an article so long as I give some sort of lip service to real ale and say it’s great and go along with the usual “CAMRA saved real ale” nonsense and pretend it’s an important thing. Sometimes they even have free sandwiches at CAMRA meetings, so I get to eat occasionally. Thank God for CAMRA, really.

      Delete
  10. Professor Pie-Tin8 April 2024 at 14:29

    The €11 daytime pint of Heineken and other lagers has arrived in Ireland.
    www.independent.ie/irish-news/price-of-a-pint-in-one-of-irelands-most-iconic-pubs-rises-to-almost-11/a1805829704.html

    ReplyDelete
  11. Professor Pie-Tin8 April 2024 at 14:35

    Or to put it another way that just under four pints short of a €1,000 keg of beer.
    Pardon my French but fuck me.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Professor Pie-Tin8 April 2024 at 15:58

    www.independent.ie/irish-news/price-of-a-pint-in-one-of-irelands-most-iconic-pubs-rises-to-almost-11/a1805829704.html

    ReplyDelete

Comments, especially on older posts, may require prior approval by the blog owner. See here for details of my comment policy.

Please register an account to comment. Unregistered comments will generally be rejected unless I recognise the author. If you want to comment using an unregistered ID, you will need to tell me something about yourself.