Thursday, 2 July 2009

Further down the slippery slope

You still hear plenty of deluded Pollyannas claiming that we really have nothing to fear from the anti-drink lobby in this country, and those who say we do are just scaremongering. But then along comes Mike Craik, Chief Constable of Northumbria and Association of Chief Police Officers national spokesman on licensing, and thus someone whose views cannot be easily dismissed, arguing in favour of an 80p minimum price per alcohol unit and a complete ban on all alcohol advertising.

Now, some people have said that a minimum price of 40 or 50p a unit wouldn’t be anything to worry about, but once the principle has been established it opens the door for the level to be constantly ratcheted up. 80p a unit would effectively double the price of mainstream drinks in the off-trade, thus making a huge hole in the budgets of ordinary households, and would start to impact on the lower end of the on-trade, for example the Sam Smiths’ estate, notorious for scenes of alcohol-related disorder. Holts Bitter in one of my local pubs is £1.84 a pint, which at 4.0% ABV is almost exactly 80p per unit.

One assumes he’d have to ban home brewing and personal imports of alcohol at the same time, otherwise legitimate domestic off-sales would decline to virtually zero.

A total advertising ban would, as I said the other day, lead to the drinks market stagnating and keep the door firmly shut against any new entrants. What’s more, it would effectively turn CAMRA into a proscribed organisation, as all its activities either revolve around the promotion of beer drinking or are funded by alcohol advertising. You can’t run a beer festival if you’re not allowed to tell anyone about it. Though you have to wonder whether they would realise what was happening until it was already too late.

Maybe this is a good argument for having elected chief police officers, as then Craik would have to submit his authoritarian, élitist views to the voters.

5 comments:

  1. Is this guy a vegetarian anti-smoker with a funny little moustache and an eye on Poland by any chance..?

    80p a unit? I'd never be able to get drunk again..

    ReplyDelete
  2. Talking about the "bansturbaters", this made me smile.

    http://www.morningadvertiser.co.uk/news.ma/article/83624

    Particularly the Prof, "It's an absolute no-brainer. There's no actual evidence that it will change behaviour but I'd like to hear arguments against it."

    I've been smiling since I read it.

    ReplyDelete
  3. That really is a classic, Alex - sounds like something out of the Daily Mash.

    ReplyDelete
  4. OK, I agree with you on this one. Banning advertising of alcohol would prevent pubs telling the world they had a particular seasonal special on for instance. Some pubs depend on this USP to thrive. It would stifle variety.

    Minimum pricing is just daft.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Going off at a slight tangent, cask beer must be one of the few products where a substantial amount of promotion is done by amateur enthusiasts. Which introduces an interestingly different dynamic to the market.

    ReplyDelete

Comments, especially on older posts, may be subject to prior approval. Bear with me – I may be in the pub.

Please be polite and remember to play the ball, not the man.

Any obvious trolling, offensive or blatantly off-topic comments will be deleted.

See this post for some thoughts on my approach to blog comments. The comment facility is not provided as a platform for personal attacks on the blog author.